Tuesday, May 8, 2012

REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN PROMOTING GROWTH AND SYSTEMIC COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ECONOMY


Introduction

Broadly speaking, regional economic integration implies the creation of the most desirable structure of inter-regional economy through the formation of a customs union or of a free, trade within the region and intentionally introducing all desirable elements of coordination and unification.
Generally, such an economic integration would have to pass through three distinct but inter-dependent stages of cooperation, co-ordination and finally, of full integration. In fact, economic integration may be identified with liberalization of trade as well as factor movements. The harmonisation or coordination of economic policies as a whole would follow once a common market has been set up.
The progress of the cooperation and economic integration of the region has a big potentiality for further industrial and economic development of the whole region in general. Information Technology industries have big potentiality for the future economic development of each country in the region. Information Technology sectors stimulate high-tech and lead the technological innovations in the economy and possibly lead the economic development of the region. The firms have significant roles, as demonstrated by the experiences over the past three decades. The effective transfer of its capability-building system, or its significant human resources management and development system still has the key importance.
Regional integration offers new and increasing prospects for Africa’s scientific and technological development. If well organized and used, integration could provide the basis for developing and sharing infrastructure for research and development, and for mobilizing and using scarce expertise and financial resources.  Science and technology consideration are being handled in the renewed efforts to promote regional economic and trade integration in Africa, and discusses new and emerging regional science and technology programmes.
By engaging in regionalism, particularly economic integration, African countries wanted to overcome three major barriers to development – the small size of their individual economies, their dependence on imports of high-value or finished goods, and their dependence on exports of a narrow range of low-value primary products, mainly natural resources[1].

MARKET CREATION OR EXPANSIONS’ ROLES FOR REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN PROMOTING GROWTH AND SYSTEMIC COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ECONOMY 

The question of Africa’s regional integration has preoccupied many African leaders since the early years of independence. Many have viewed it as a tool for promoting economic growth and sustainable development and improving the living standards of the African people. The overall strategic objective of regrouping African countries was to fight the impact of colonialism and build a united Africa.
The formation of the OAU (Organisation of African Unity), now the African Union (AU) was the first step towards promoting continental unity. Since its inception, significant new efforts have been put in place. Nevertheless, Africa has comparatively few success stories to tell with respect to regional integration.
Recognizing the importance of regional integration to developing a strong, united Africa, the continent’s leaders have established a number of initiatives, the most notable of which include the following:
n  A. 1. Scale effects:
n  Rationalization of inefficient industries through reallocation of resources
n  Creation of large markets allowing small firms to reach optimal size
n  Economies of scale, reduction in average costs of production and lower consumer prices
n  A.2. Variety Effects
n  Integrating a country’s economy into a wider market allows consumers to choose from a varied array of goods, which should increase their welfare.
n  Increased competition across a wide range of products can also lower consumer prices.
n  From a firm’s perspective, the opportunity to choose from a wider array of production factors would enable it to use the most appropriate inputs, which could increase its productivity.

n  B. Accumulation effects: Investment and Trade
n  Greater opportunities to specialize lower production costs, greater returns to factors of production, greater returns to physical and non-physical factor accumulation.
n  Technological spill-over resulting from regionalism lead to increases in productivity and the reduction of production costs, further attracting more investment, and hence, factor accumulation.
n  C. Location: The formation of a trade bloc can have an influence on the location decisions of foreign firms.
n  3 key location variables are (a) market size, (b) the cost of production and the availability of relevant production factors, and (c) market access.
n   Offering the most segmented market in the world, Africa’s trade costs are much higher than in any other region which has discouraged foreign investment while keeping trade flows at very low levels. Market expansion through regional economic integration can contribute to overcoming this constraint.
n  Regional economic integration: more efficiency, faster accumulation, larger trade: a positive effect on economic growth.
n  Considering that higher efficiency and faster accumulation are ingredients of a competitive system, regional integration could be a stepping stone for Africa’s integration in the global economy.

RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS' ROLES FOR REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN PROMOTING GROWTH AND SYSTEMIC COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL AND NATION ECONOMY


Particularly, in view of their national markets being rather narrow for the successful operation of modern industrialization and implementation of technological innovations, it is conceived as a regional market to enhance modern industrial development and also to achieve economies of scale in the respective member-nations.
Institutions and technological innovations drive global economic integration. In any era, great powers seek to provide international stability in order to secure their own interests and, by extension, encourage international trade. After World War II, the U.S. and its allies explicitly sought to encourage global economic integration through institutions like the International Monetary Fund. More recently, technological advances like the Internet have reduced communication and information barriers and fueled unprecedented levels of economic integration[2].
Many African leaders and the international community are increasingly recognizing that science, technology and innovation are critical for the transformation of economies, reduction of poverty, attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and integration of the continent into the global knowledge economy[3]. To transform their economies African countries should focus on measures that will improve  their technological readiness, enlarge technological capabilities to innovate, improve the quality of  their institutions of knowledge (mainly R&D and higher learning), and generally build stronger and  dynamic national systems of innovation. They should seize the grand opportunities to address the challenges outlined above. This requires both political and administrative leadership from governments, particularly the executive and legislative branches to champion the building of systems of innovation and the promotion of technological innovation for poverty reduction, economic growth and competitiveness[4].

Technology

Global economic integration also relies upon travel, information and communication innovations. Air travel, for instance, enables business and government representatives to move quickly from one country to another in order to coordinate international economic activity. Similarly, telephone and video communication have grown increasingly widespread, inexpensive and reliable. Perhaps most importantly, computers and the Internet allow access to global economic information, instantaneous collaboration across space and simplified tools to move capital between states. Taken together, these technologies allow for increasingly global economic transactions and supply chains[5].

Regional cooperation in science, technology and innovation is also important for collective technological learning and peer influence among the countries. Countries with weak and underdeveloped systems of innovation are able to learn from those that have better developed systems. They can share information and experiences on what works better in terms of designing and implementing science, technology and innovation policies; how to better organize their R&D institutions; and other aspects of governing science, technology and innovation.
The integration of S&T considerations into regional agreements is based on the recognition that their individual economies are small and unable to marshal scientific and technological resources for development. Many countries are poorly endowed with the human, physical and financial resources necessary to develop and harness science and technology for economic change and growth. Thus, as economists would contend, economies of scale dictate that such countries pool their resources[6].
It is worth noting that the renewed interest in and efforts to promote regionalism are taking place at a time of the globalization of economic production and the associated rapid advances in technology.8 Regionalization is being driven by advances in transport, information and communications technologies (ICTs), as well as in policy and politics. This is evident in the increasing transboundary movements of people, finance and products across the region. Intraregional foreign direct investment flows are also increasing.

ENHANCED BARGAINING POWERS' ROLES FOR REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN PROMOTING GROWTH AND SYSTEMIC COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ECONOMY 


Enhanced bargaining power
By banding together through regional integration arrangements, member countries can enhance their international economic bargaining power, especially beneficial for small countries in trade negotiations (Fernandez and Portes 1998; Schiff and Winters 1998; World Bank 2000b). But members must negotiate as a group—an approach not always taken because of divergent national interests. A related goal of regional integration arrangements is to raise the profile of members.
Using regional integration arrangements to enhance bargaining power can have a serious drawback, however. Countries, particularly small and low income ones, try to attract Foreign direct investment (FDI) using a variety of incentives, including tax concessions. If an arrangement gives a foreign firm in one member country free access to the markets of all, members may compete against each other using tax concessions, inducing a “race to the bottom “among members as they compete to attract FDI. This outcome can be avoided only if regional integration arrangements regulate such concessions.

Benefits of Regional Economic Integration

Regional economic communities are formed because of the expected benefits from them. An important feature of the higher levels of integration is free trade among members. Free trade is expected to lead to rapid expansion of trade among members, which in turn is expected to lead to rapid economic growth. These gains result from the dynamic effects of a Community Unity, which have been shown to overshadow the static effects, viz., trade creation, trade diversion and terms of trade effect. 
The dynamic effects, which are cumulative in nature, lead to growth. Indeed, the dynamic effects of a Community Unity are often described as the long-run consequences for the economic growth of member countries as a consequence of increased market size and exploitation of economies of scale, increased competition, learning by doing, and increased investment, Cooper and Massell (1965), Iyoha (1977) and Kreinin (1964). Iyoha (1977) has shown that the larger the CU, the more likely it is to lead to growth since the larger the CU, the larger will be the market created. Also, the stronger the potential economies of scale are, and the more rapid the autonomous productivity advances, the more likely will the CU lead to growth. Thus, the contribution of a CU (or regional integration in general) to economic growth will be greater if the exploitation of scale economies, made possible by increased market size, takes place with learning by doing.
Regional integration was a complex process; it requires expertise for policy formulation and analysis; managing the process; negotiating protocols and other regulations; understanding the process; participating in the process as well as exploiting opportunities. Regional Integration and Development (IRID) innovations will play a critical role of producing young professionals and experts in regional integration.

CHALLENGES FOR REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN PROMOTING GROWTH AND SYSTEMIC COMPETITIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ECONOMY 

The various African regional economic blocs, and indeed the individual countries that comprise their membership, are at varying stages of development and implementation of their regional arrangements.
The blocs’ scope covers various socio-economic, developmental and political considerations, including the promotion of intra-regional trade, socio-economic policy coordination, and management or development of shared physical infrastructure and the environment. Some of the African regional arrangements also cover issues of common interest in the areas of public governance, defense and security, among other socio-economic and political dimensions.
. Some African countries have only recently rekindled their interest in economic integration, but for different reasons from the initial decolonization agenda and the desire to overcome the colonially imposed “artificial” boundaries. They have been inspired by the success of integration efforts in Europe and the Americas. They also need post-independence economic integration to gain bargaining power and survive economically against the threat of marginalisation in the globalization process.
The regional economic integration in promoting the growth and systemic competitiveness of the regional and national economy will face with many challenges known the social cultural factors, wars, lack of unity and common interest among the countries, slow integration of the technology, bad governance, corruption, limited access to infrastructures and lack of political stability.
In order to overcome the Effective pooling of resources and expertise to tackle cross-cutting regional challenges, such as infrastructure, governance, gender, HIV/AIDS, peace, security and conflict prevention, can help reduce the average costs of delivery, and also assist to harmonise and raise standards.


Done on 03rd May 2012
By Jean Paul NTEZIRYAYO

No comments:

Post a Comment